H.J.Res. 177

H.J.Res. 177: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Fair Credit Reporting; Name-Onl

Introduced Bill Foster (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 177 is a resolution that seeks to disapprove a rule put forth by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) regarding the withdrawal of a regulation related to fair credit reporting, specifically concerning the use of names only in credit reporting. If passed, this resolution would prevent the CFPB from withdrawing the existing rule, thereby maintaining the current regulations on fair credit reporting practices.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 177 argue that maintaining the existing rule is essential for protecting consumers' rights and ensuring fair treatment in credit reporting. They highlight that the rule helps prevent discrimination and promotes transparency in how credit information is reported and used, which is beneficial for consumers seeking loans and credit.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 177 contend that the resolution undermines the CFPB's ability to adapt regulations to changing market conditions. They argue that the withdrawal of the rule was a necessary step to modernize and streamline credit reporting practices, and that the resolution may hinder efforts to improve the overall efficiency and fairness of the credit reporting system.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.J.Res. 177 indicates no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the top donor industries of sponsor Bill Foster. The bill pertains to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's rule on fair credit reporting, while Foster's top donors do not represent industries directly involved in consumer finance or credit reporting. The lobbying activity surrounding this bill includes various entities, such as SANA HEALTH, which contributed $7,500, but their specific interests do not appear to conflict with the bill's intent. Overall, the lack of direct financial ties suggests minimal risk of conflicts of interest for voters to consider.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SPHERE LABS TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC $22,000
ATZ MANUFACTURING TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC $21,750
THE PRESIDENTS' FORUM OF THE DISTILLED SPIRITS INDUSTRY THE PRESIDENTS' FORUM OF THE DISTILLED SPIRITS INDUSTRY $20,000
SANA HEALTH TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC $7,500
NEBRASKA RURAL GENERATION LLC JABAL COMPANIES LLC undisclosed
RHOBACK, INC. ATLAS CROSSING LLC undisclosed
GLOBAL MOBILE SOFTWARE LLC TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC undisclosed
SUMAIR VIRANI COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
NATIONAL STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS TRADE ASSOCIATION COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
NUMERACLE, INC. ACG ADVOCACY undisclosed
AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION undisclosed
HUBBARD HOUSE RESTAURANT, LLC COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
INTUIT INC., AND ITS ENTERPRISE MEMBERS COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
NATIONAL CENTER OF SEXUAL EXPLOITATION (NCOSE) ACG ADVOCACY undisclosed
SHARED ECONOMY SERVICES, LLC TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Bill Foster, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $200,000,000
Individuals: $200,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $62,500,000
Individuals: $62,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us