H.R. 9144

H.R. 9144: To include reasonable costs for high-speed internet service in the utility allowances for families residing in public housing, and for other purposes.

Introduced Bill Foster (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9144 aims to allow public housing authorities to include reasonable costs for high-speed internet service when calculating utility allowances for families living in public housing. This means that families could receive additional financial support to help cover the costs of internet access, recognizing its importance for education, employment, and connectivity.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9144 have praised the bill for acknowledging the essential role of high-speed internet in modern life, especially for low-income families. Advocates argue that by including internet costs in utility allowances, the bill promotes digital equity and helps bridge the digital divide, ensuring that all families have access to necessary online resources.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9144 have raised concerns about the potential financial burden on public housing authorities. Some argue that including internet costs in utility allowances could complicate funding and budgeting processes, diverting resources away from other critical services. Additionally, there are worries that the bill may not adequately address the quality or affordability of internet service itself.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

The bill H.R. 9144 aims to include reasonable costs for high-speed internet service in utility allowances for families in public housing. The sponsor, Bill Foster, has significant financial backing from the health professionals industry, totaling $240 million, and from retired individuals, amounting to $75 million. However, there is no direct overlap between the interests of these donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which focuses on internet services rather than health or retirement issues. This lack of direct industry connection suggests that the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal. Voters should be aware that while large donations can raise questions about influence, in this case, the specific interests of the top donors do not align with the bill's objectives, indicating a lower risk of conflict.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Bill Foster, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us