H.R. 9144

H.R. 9144: To include reasonable costs for high-speed internet service in the utility allowances for families residing in public housing, and for other purposes.

Introduced Bill Foster (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9144 aims to allow public housing authorities to include reasonable costs for high-speed internet service when calculating utility allowances for families living in public housing. This means that families could receive additional financial support to help cover the costs of internet access, recognizing its importance for education, employment, and connectivity.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9144 have praised the bill for acknowledging the essential role of high-speed internet in modern life, especially for low-income families. Advocates argue that by including internet costs in utility allowances, the bill promotes digital equity and helps bridge the digital divide, ensuring that all families have access to necessary online resources.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9144 have raised concerns about the potential financial burden on public housing authorities. Some argue that including internet costs in utility allowances could complicate funding and budgeting processes, diverting resources away from other critical services. Additionally, there are worries that the bill may not adequately address the quality or affordability of internet service itself.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Housing and Community Development

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9144, there is significant lobbying activity from major tech companies such as Alibaba Group and Tencent America, which have invested substantial amounts in lobbying efforts related to high-speed internet services. Tencent America has contributed $200,000 and Alibaba Group $80,000 through various lobbying firms. This raises concerns about potential influence on the bill's provisions, particularly as these companies could benefit from increased public housing internet allowances. Voters should be aware of these financial ties, as they may indicate a prioritization of corporate interests over public welfare in legislative decisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA, LLC BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $200,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $80,000
B&H FOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP STONINGTON GLOBAL $75,000
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. $60,000
NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC $10,000
SULLIVAN STRATEGIES OBO ODOT COLUMBIA STRATEGIC COUNSEL $10,000
ACT FOR AMERICA ACT FOR AMERICA $10,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
XTAR LLC THE MADISON GROUP undisclosed
ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK undisclosed
ARDMORE CONSULTING GROUP, INC BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP undisclosed
T-MOBILE USA, INC. ALPINE ADVISORS undisclosed
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. undisclosed
PLAYPOWER, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Bill Foster, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us