S. 5031

S. 5031: A bill to amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to expand participation by underrepresented populations in service programs, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mark Kelly (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 5031 aims to amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 with the goal of increasing participation in service programs from underrepresented populations. This likely includes provisions to enhance outreach, support, and resources to ensure that diverse groups have greater access to national and community service opportunities.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted S. 5031 as a progressive step towards inclusivity, emphasizing the importance of diverse representation in community service. Supporters argue that expanding participation can strengthen communities and foster a sense of belonging among different demographic groups, ultimately enhancing the impact of service programs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 5031 have raised concerns about the potential for the bill to prioritize certain populations over others, arguing that it may lead to divisiveness or unequal access to resources. Some media outlets have questioned the effectiveness of such measures, suggesting that they may not address the underlying issues that prevent participation in service programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The analysis of bill S. 5031, which aims to expand participation by underrepresented populations in service programs, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Mark Kelly's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the expansion of service programs, which mitigates potential conflicts of interest. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from organizations such as the American College of Emergency Physicians ($498,299) and the Trust for Public Land ($150,000) do not indicate a direct financial stake in the outcomes of this bill. Therefore, the risk of conflict is assessed as low, as the financial interests of the donors do not align with the objectives of the legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS $498,299
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND $150,000
COLLIER COLLECTIVE, LLC MCCOLL STRATEGIES LLC $40,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
PANO AI PANO AI $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
PSEG SERVICES CORPORATION TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
COUNTY OF NAPA PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
LAKE COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NEVADA COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
HUMBOLDT COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATORS PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
NATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
CLARK COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mark Kelly, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us