S. 4887

S. 4887: A bill to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program to provide hazardous fuels transportation grants, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mark Kelly (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4887 is a bill that aims to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to create a program that provides grants for the transportation of hazardous fuels. This program is likely intended to enhance safety measures and improve the management of hazardous materials related to agricultural practices.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4887 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to managing hazardous fuels, which can pose significant risks to both public safety and the environment. The establishment of transportation grants is seen as a vital step in ensuring safer agricultural practices and preventing potential disasters.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4887 argue that the bill may not adequately address the underlying issues related to hazardous fuels and transportation safety. Some have expressed concerns that the focus on grants could lead to misallocation of resources or insufficient oversight, potentially jeopardizing safety measures.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

The analysis of Bill S. 4887, which aims to establish a program for hazardous fuels transportation grants, shows no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor, Mark Kelly's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from these lobbying entities do not indicate a direct financial interest in hazardous fuels transportation. For example, the Port of New Orleans contributed $130,000, but its interests may be broader than just hazardous fuels. Other contributors like RPM International Inc. and the National Association for Oilheat Research and Education have also made contributions, but their specific ties to the bill are not evident. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears low based on the available data.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CRYPTO COUNCIL FOR INNOVATION CRYPTO COUNCIL FOR INNOVATION $310,000
PORT OF NEW ORLEANS (PORT NOLA) SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $130,000
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC THE CJR GROUP, INC. $40,000
LA MAESTRA FOUNDATION ON BEHALF OF LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC, INC. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $20,000
JEFFERSON PARISH CORONER'S OFFICE ADAMS AND REESE, LLP $20,000
GREENVILLE WATER SYSTEM ADAMS AND REESE, LLP $20,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR OILHEAT RESEARCH AND EDUCATION SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $10,000
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY THE CJR GROUP, INC. $10,000
BELLEFAIRE JCB THE CJR GROUP, INC. $10,000
TERADAR BELTWAY GUIDED STRATEGIES $7,500
METABANK SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
MEAB SAL SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
M1 GROUP SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
US-INDIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP FORUM, INC. US-INDIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP FORUM, INC. undisclosed
H CYCLE, LLC SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mark Kelly, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us