S. 5029

S. 5029: A bill to amend the requirements for teaching residency programs under part A of title II of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

Introduced Mark Kelly (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 5029 aims to modify the requirements for teaching residency programs established under part A of title II of the Higher Education Act of 1965. This may involve changes to how these programs are structured, funded, or operated, potentially impacting teacher training and preparation in the U.S.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 5029 argue that the amendments will enhance the quality of teacher preparation programs, ensuring that new educators are better equipped to meet the demands of modern classrooms. This could lead to improved educational outcomes for students and a stronger teaching workforce.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 5029 express concerns that the changes may undermine existing standards for teacher residency programs, potentially leading to a decrease in the quality of teacher training. There are fears that these amendments could prioritize flexibility over rigor, risking the effectiveness of future educators.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of bill S. 5029, which aims to amend teaching residency program requirements, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Mark Kelly's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the education sector or the specific provisions of the Higher Education Act. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the amounts from these lobbying entities do not indicate a significant financial influence directly tied to the bill. For instance, the largest lobbying contribution comes from Saildrone Inc. with $410,042, but this does not correlate with the education focus of the bill. Overall, the lack of direct financial ties suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $410,042
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $377,725
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. $158,589
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION $150,000
SBIR CONSORTIUM JOHN WILLIAMS $30,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS $30,000
SEEING MACHINES GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC $30,000
MIDDLE EAST FORUM MIDDLE EAST FORUM $20,000
SHEA'S O'CONNELL PRESERVATION GUILD LTD. D/B/A SHEA'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTER MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ATA ACTION RS GROUP CONSULTING LLC $6,000
END SEPSIS CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
TECHNEST SOLUTIONS S.L.A. DBA FORTRIS ON BEHALF OF NEXUSONE CONSULTING CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
SBCC EQUIPMENT DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mark Kelly, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us