H.Res. 1188

H.Res. 1188: Expressing support for the work of open water lifeguards as first responders and emergency response providers.

Introduced Christopher Smith (R) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1188 is a resolution expressing support for open water lifeguards, recognizing them as first responders and emergency response providers. The resolution likely acknowledges the critical role lifeguards play in ensuring safety in aquatic environments and highlights their contributions to emergency response efforts.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage of H.Res. 1188 is likely to be positive, emphasizing the importance of recognizing lifeguards as key figures in public safety. Supporters may highlight the resolution as a step towards acknowledging the demanding and essential nature of lifeguards' work, especially in preventing drownings and providing emergency care.

Negative Media Summary

Criticism of H.Res. 1188 might focus on the symbolic nature of the resolution, arguing that it does not address more substantive issues such as funding or resources for lifeguard training and equipment. Some may view it as insufficient in terms of providing tangible support or improvements to their working conditions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The bill H.Res. 1188, sponsored by Christopher Smith, expresses support for the work of open water lifeguards as first responders and emergency response providers. There is no direct overlap detected between the bill's subject matter and the top donor industries of the sponsor. The lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not seem to have a direct connection with the bill's subject matter. The largest lobbying amount comes from the National Education Association with $670,000, but this does not appear to be directly related to the bill's focus on open water lifeguards. Other lobbying activities, such as those from AccentCare, Inc., Russell Investments Group, LLC, and various banks and airlines, also do not appear to have a direct connection to the bill's subject matter. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears to be low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION $670,000
ACCENTCARE, INC. ACCENTCARE, INC. $235,000
ACCENTCARE, INC. ACCENTCARE, INC. $235,000
TD BANK, NA GEOFFREY P. GRAY $60,000
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA GEOFFREY P. GRAY $50,000
CORELOGIC GEOFFREY P. GRAY $50,000
WISCONSIN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION WISCONSIN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION $40,000
RUSSELL INVESTMENTS GROUP, LLC GEOFFREY P. GRAY $30,000
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY GEOFFREY P. GRAY $30,000
RELX INC. GEOFFREY P. GRAY $30,000
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS COALITION GEOFFREY P. GRAY $30,000
INTERNATIONAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATION $30,000
AMERICAN AIRLINES INC (FORMERLY REPORTED AS "AMERICAN AIRLINES") GEOFFREY P. GRAY $20,000
JPMORGAN CHASE HOLDINGS LLC GEOFFREY P. GRAY undisclosed
TULE RIVER TRIBE PATTERSON REAL BIRD & RASMUSSEN LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Christopher Smith, ranked by total contributions.

Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0
Health Professionals $30,000,000
Individuals: $30,000,000 PACs: $0
Securities & Investment $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0
Government $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)