H.R. 9791

H.R. 9791: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the requirements for the small business waiver from device fees related to annual establishment registration, and for other purposes.

Introduced Scott Perry (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9791 aims to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to modify the requirements for small businesses to qualify for a waiver from device fees associated with annual establishment registration. This change is intended to ease the financial burden on small businesses involved in the medical device industry, making it more feasible for them to comply with regulatory requirements.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9791 have praised the bill for its potential to foster innovation and growth within the small business sector of the medical device industry. They argue that reducing financial barriers will encourage more entrepreneurs to enter the market, ultimately leading to increased competition and better healthcare solutions for consumers.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9791 have raised concerns that the bill may undermine regulatory oversight by allowing more businesses to bypass fees that contribute to the safety and efficacy of medical devices. They argue that this could lead to a decrease in product quality and pose risks to public health if not properly managed.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of H.R. 9791 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Scott Perry's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning device fees and small business waivers. The primary lobbying activity in this area comes from organizations such as the American College of Emergency Physicians, which contributed $498,299, but this does not directly correlate with the sponsor's donor base. The lack of direct financial ties suggests minimal risk of conflicts of interest, as the bill does not appear to benefit any specific donor or industry connected to Perry. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the absence of overlapping donor interests indicates a lower likelihood of undue influence on the legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS $498,299
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND $150,000
COLLIER COLLECTIVE, LLC MCCOLL STRATEGIES LLC $40,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
PANO AI PANO AI $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
PSEG SERVICES CORPORATION TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
COUNTY OF NAPA PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
LAKE COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NEVADA COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
HUMBOLDT COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATORS PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
NATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
CLARK COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Perry, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us