S.J.Res. 202

S.J.Res. 202: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Small Business Administration relating to “Citizenship and Residency Requirements and Recission of Proce

Introduced Edward Markey (D) SENATE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S.J.Res. 202 is a joint resolution that aims to disapprove a rule issued by the Small Business Administration (SBA) regarding the citizenship and residency requirements for small business assistance programs. This resolution is part of a congressional effort to overturn specific regulatory changes made by the SBA that may affect eligibility criteria for small business support.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised S.J.Res. 202 as a necessary step to ensure that small business assistance programs remain accessible to a broader range of entrepreneurs, promoting inclusivity and support for diverse business owners. Advocates argue that the resolution protects the interests of small businesses and fosters economic growth.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S.J.Res. 202 have expressed concern that disapproving the SBA's rule could undermine efforts to ensure that small business support is directed towards those who are legally eligible and contribute to the economy. Some media reports suggest that the resolution may create confusion and uncertainty in the small business community regarding eligibility for assistance.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of S.J.Res. 202 indicates a low risk of conflicts of interest for sponsor Edward Markey, as there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area is primarily focused on companies like Cormedix Inc. and the Telecommunications Industry Association, which do not have a direct connection to the Small Business Administration's rule regarding citizenship and residency requirements. The total lobbying amounts from these entities, such as $220,000 from Cormedix Inc., do not suggest a significant influence over the bill's content or intent. Therefore, voters can be reassured that the sponsor's financial backers do not appear to have a vested interest in the legislative outcome of this resolution.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CORMEDIX INC. CORMEDIX INC. $220,000
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE $180,000
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $70,000
TERRANOVA INC FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
POSEIDON AEROSPACE FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
SAALEX CORPORATION FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
HERTHA METALS FRONTERA GROUP $15,000
MN8 ENERGY LLC MN8 ENERGY LLC $15,000
RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $10,000
VERMONT CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $8,000
AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURERS COALITION WILEY REIN LLP undisclosed
UNCAC COALITION UNCAC COALITION undisclosed
CFA INSTITUTE CFA INSTITUTE undisclosed
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA STUDENT ASSOCIATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA STUDENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Edward Markey, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us