H.J.Res. 206

H.J.Res. 206: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that any Representative or Senator be a natural born citizen.

Introduced Scott Perry (R) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 206 proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would require all members of Congress, specifically Representatives and Senators, to be natural born citizens of the United States. This means that only individuals who were citizens at birth would be eligible to serve in these legislative positions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 206 argue that this amendment would help ensure that all members of Congress have a strong allegiance to the United States, reinforcing the idea that only those with a deep-rooted connection to the country should hold such significant positions of power. Proponents believe this could enhance national security and public trust in government.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 206 contend that the amendment is unnecessary and could be seen as discriminatory. They argue that it undermines the values of inclusivity and representation in democracy, potentially excluding qualified individuals who have contributed to the country but were not born citizens. Some also view it as a politically motivated move that distracts from more pressing legislative issues.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.J.Res. 206, which proposes an amendment to require that any Representative or Senator be a natural born citizen, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Scott Perry's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes significant contributions from various corporations, such as Cormedix Inc. ($220,000) and the Telecommunications Industry Association ($70,000). However, these contributions do not directly relate to the constitutional amendment concerning citizenship requirements for legislators. As such, there are minimal concerns regarding conflicts of interest stemming from the sponsor's financial backers. Voters should be aware that while lobbying influences exist, they do not appear to intersect with the intent of this particular bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CORMEDIX INC. CORMEDIX INC. $220,000
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE $180,000
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $70,000
TERRANOVA INC FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
POSEIDON AEROSPACE FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
SAALEX CORPORATION FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
HERTHA METALS FRONTERA GROUP $15,000
MN8 ENERGY LLC MN8 ENERGY LLC $15,000
RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $10,000
VERMONT CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $8,000
AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURERS COALITION WILEY REIN LLP undisclosed
UNCAC COALITION UNCAC COALITION undisclosed
CFA INSTITUTE CFA INSTITUTE undisclosed
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA STUDENT ASSOCIATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA STUDENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Perry, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us