H.R. 9480

H.R. 9480: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for amounts contributed to home savings accounts, and for other purposes.

Introduced Scott Perry (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9480 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code to allow individuals to deduct contributions made to home savings accounts from their taxable income. This aims to encourage savings for home purchases by providing a tax benefit for those contributing to these accounts.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9480 argue that the bill will promote homeownership by making it easier for individuals to save for down payments. Media coverage highlights the potential for increased access to housing for first-time buyers and the positive impact on the economy as more people invest in homes.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9480 express concerns that the bill may disproportionately benefit higher-income individuals who are more likely to have the means to contribute to home savings accounts. Some media outlets argue that it could divert attention from more comprehensive housing reforms needed to address affordability issues.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9480, which proposes allowing deductions for contributions to home savings accounts, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Scott Perry's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. Perry's largest donor industry is Health Professionals, contributing $120 million, followed by Retired individuals at $37.5 million. Since these industries do not directly relate to home savings accounts or tax deductions, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Furthermore, while there is significant lobbying activity in various sectors, none of the lobbying amounts correlate with the sponsor's donor industries, indicating a lack of direct financial influence on this specific legislation. Voters should be aware that while there are substantial contributions from certain industries, they do not seem to influence this particular bill's content.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION ACTION INC ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
COMCAST CORPORATION THEGROUP DC, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC $40,000
CLEAN FUELS ALLIANCE AMERICA (FORMERLY REPORTED AS NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD) BRACEWELL LLP $40,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION BRICK STREET STRATEGY $20,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Perry, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us