H.R. 9142

H.R. 9142: To amend title 35, United State Code, to limit the ability of persons who pose a threat to national security to receive and enforce patents, and for other purposes.

Introduced Scott Fitzgerald (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9142 aims to amend U.S. patent law to restrict individuals or entities that are deemed a threat to national security from obtaining and enforcing patents. This legislation seeks to enhance national security by preventing potentially harmful actors from leveraging patent rights for malicious purposes.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9142 argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect national security interests and ensure that sensitive technologies do not fall into the wrong hands. Media coverage highlights the importance of safeguarding innovation and protecting the U.S. from potential espionage or sabotage.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9142 express concerns that the bill could lead to overreach and the unjust denial of patent rights to individuals or companies without sufficient evidence of a threat to national security. Some media outlets warn that the legislation could stifle innovation and create a chilling effect on inventors who may fear being labeled as security risks.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of H.R. 9142, sponsored by Scott Fitzgerald, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill aims to limit patent rights for individuals posing a national security threat, which does not appear to intersect with the interests of Fitzgerald's major donors. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from entities like Verdego Aero ($200,000) and Anello Photonics ($30,000) do not indicate a direct conflict, as their business interests are not clearly aligned with the bill's intent. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest is assessed as low, as the financial contributions do not suggest a motive to influence the legislation in favor of the donors' interests.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Fitzgerald, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us