H.R. 9459

H.R. 9459: To amend the Truth in Lending Act to modernize disclosure requirements, establish materiality standards and safe harbors for mortgage disclosures, simplify waiting period requirements, expand tolerances for annual percentage rate accuracy, and

Introduced Scott Fitzgerald (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9459 aims to update the Truth in Lending Act by improving the way mortgage disclosures are presented to consumers. It seeks to set clear standards for what information is considered important (materiality) and provides protections (safe harbors) for lenders regarding these disclosures. The bill also looks to simplify the waiting periods for mortgage approvals and increase the allowable discrepancies in annual percentage rates (APRs) to make the process more efficient.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9459 argue that the bill will streamline mortgage processes, making it easier for consumers to understand loan terms and conditions. They highlight that modernizing disclosure requirements will enhance transparency and potentially lead to a more competitive mortgage market, benefiting consumers.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9459 express concern that the changes could dilute consumer protections by allowing lenders more leeway in how they disclose important information. They worry that simplifying requirements might lead to confusion among borrowers and could result in less accountability for lenders regarding the accuracy of mortgage terms.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Housing and Community Development

The analysis of H.R. 9459, which aims to amend the Truth in Lending Act, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Scott Fitzgerald's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The significant lobbying activity in the policy area includes contributions from various entities such as RESPOND-US ($140,000) and GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. ($60,000), but these do not directly relate to mortgage disclosures or lending practices. Given the absence of overlapping interests, the risk of conflicts of interest appears minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not directly influence the bill's provisions as per the current data.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION ACTION INC ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Fitzgerald, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us