H.R. 9132

H.R. 9132: To prohibit foreign nationals from entering into or enforcing surrogacy contracts in the United States, and for other purposes.

Introduced Scott Perry (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9132 aims to prohibit foreign nationals from entering into or enforcing surrogacy contracts within the United States. This means that individuals from other countries would not be able to engage in surrogacy arrangements that are legally recognized or enforced in the U.S.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9132 argue that the bill protects U.S. citizens and ensures that surrogacy practices adhere to domestic laws and ethical standards. They believe it safeguards the rights of surrogates and intended parents, promoting a more regulated and secure environment for surrogacy in the country.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9132 contend that the bill could limit reproductive rights and access to surrogacy for individuals who may not have viable options domestically. They argue that it could disproportionately affect those seeking surrogacy services, particularly members of the LGBTQ+ community and individuals with medical conditions that prevent them from carrying pregnancies.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9132, which seeks to prohibit foreign nationals from entering into or enforcing surrogacy contracts in the United States, shows no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Scott Perry's top donor industries. The primary lobbying activity in this policy area appears to be concentrated in the transportation and logistics sectors, with significant contributions from companies such as Tencent America LLC ($410,000) and the National Motor Freight Traffic Association ($22,500). However, these industries do not have a direct connection to the subject matter of surrogacy contracts, suggesting that there is minimal risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying is present, it does not pertain to the bill's focus on surrogacy, indicating a low potential for undue influence from donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. MO STRATEGIES, INC. $530,000
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MO STRATEGIES, INC. $530,000
TENCENT AMERICA LLC HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP $410,000
BORDER TRADE ALLIANCE BC CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MO STRATEGIES, INC. $60,000
FRESH PRODUCE ASSOCIATION OF THE AMERICAS BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
WERNER ENTERPRISES BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
NATIONAL TANK TRUCK CARRIER, INC. BC CONSULTING, LLC $37,500
STEVENS TRUCKING BC CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION BC CONSULTING, LLC $22,500
STARR-CAMARGO BRIDGE COMPANY BC CONSULTING, LLC $15,000
STRAUNS CUSTOMHOUSE BROKERS, LLC BC CONSULTING, LLC $7,500
CLEAN FREIGHT COALITION MULLEN CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ASHEBORO CRANFILL SUMNER LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Perry, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us