H.R. 5911

H.R. 5911: Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act

Reported by Committee Jeff Hurd (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The H.R. 5911: Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act likely involves the transfer or conveyance of ownership or management of the Crystal Reservoir. This could mean transferring the reservoir from federal to state or local control, or possibly from public to private ownership. The specifics would depend on the details provided within the bill, which are not available in this case.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act may argue that the bill allows for more localized control and management of the reservoir, potentially leading to more efficient and tailored oversight. Proponents might also claim that such a transfer could enhance recreational opportunities or improve maintenance and conservation efforts by aligning them more closely with local needs and priorities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act might express concerns over the potential for reduced public access or environmental oversight if the reservoir is transferred to a non-federal entity. Opponents could argue that local or private management might prioritize economic interests over environmental protection, leading to negative impacts on the ecosystem or public enjoyment of the reservoir.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

There appears to be a low risk of conflicts of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. The sponsor, Jeff Hurd, has received significant donations from the Health Professionals and Retired industries, but there is no direct overlap with the subject matter of the Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act. The lobbying activity in the bill's policy area is also not directly related to these industries. The largest disclosed lobbying amount in this policy area is $120,000 from the American Rivers Action Fund, but it is not clear whether this has any direct influence on the bill or the sponsor. The lack of disclosed amounts from most lobbying groups makes it difficult to fully assess the potential influence of these groups.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN RIVERS ACTION FUND AMERICAN RIVERS ACTION FUND $120,000
COLLEGE OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVES COLLEGE OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVES $30,000
WINDOW COVERING MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION NORTHSTAR EK LLC $30,000
SHINE TECHNOLOGIES NORTHSTAR EK LLC $30,000
PRIVATE CARE ASSOCIATION INC HOLLRAH LLC $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKFORCE BOARDS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKFORCE BOARDS undisclosed
MYSTERY SHOPPING PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION, INC. HOLLRAH LLC undisclosed
COALITION TO PRESERVE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS HOLLRAH LLC undisclosed
TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ACTION FUND SACHS MEDIA. INC. undisclosed
NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY undisclosed
SYENSQO USA LLC RIDGELINE ADVOCACY GROUP LLC undisclosed
PUEBLO OF JEMEZ DENTONS US LLP undisclosed
INVIVYD, INC. KING & SPALDING LLP undisclosed
EUROPORT, INC. MO STRATEGIES, INC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jeff Hurd, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)