S. 2280

S. 2280: A bill to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain parcels of Federal land in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, and for other purposes.

Passed Senate Jim Justice (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The bill titled S. 2280 likely proposes the transfer of administrative control over specific parcels of federal land located in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia. This means that the responsibility for managing these lands would shift from one federal entity to another, which could involve changes in how the land is used, maintained, or developed. The bill may also include additional provisions related to this transfer, as suggested by the phrase 'and for other purposes.'

Positive Media Summary

Positive media coverage of the bill may highlight the potential benefits of transferring administrative jurisdiction, such as improved management and maintenance of the land, increased local input and control, or enhanced opportunities for economic development or conservation efforts. Supporters might argue that the transfer could lead to more efficient and effective use of the land in alignment with local needs and priorities.

Negative Media Summary

Negative media coverage might focus on concerns about the transfer of jurisdiction leading to mismanagement or overdevelopment of the land. Critics could argue that the change might reduce federal oversight and protection of important natural or historical resources in Harpers Ferry. There might also be worries about the lack of transparency or public input in the decision-making process related to the transfer.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The bill S. 2280 pertains to the administrative jurisdiction over certain parcels of Federal land in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia. The sponsor of the bill, Jim Justice, does not appear to have any direct industry overlaps between the subject matter of the bill and his top donor industries. This indicates a low risk of conflict of interest. The lobbying activity in the bill's policy area does not seem to be directly related to the bill's subject matter or to the sponsor's top donors. The largest lobbying amounts were from the Bristow Group, Inc. ($190,000), Global Electronics Association ($350,000), and Mosmart North America, LLC ($110,000). However, these organizations do not seem to have a direct stake in the bill's subject matter. Therefore, the potential for conflict of interest based on the data provided is low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
GLOBAL ELECTRONICS ASSOCIATION (FKA IPC INTERNATIONAL) GLOBAL ELECTRONICS ASSOCATION (FKA IPC INTERNATIONAL) $350,000
BRISTOW GROUP, INC. BRISTOW GROUP, INC. $190,000
MOSMART NORTH AMERICA, LLC TCGA GROUP, LLC $110,000
MARITIME INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT MARITIME INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT $60,000
NATIONAL STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING ASSOCIATION TULIPIFERA STRATEGIES $10,000
TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER TULIPIFERA STRATEGIES $10,000
GENESIS HEALTH SCIENCES LLC GENESIS HEALTH SCIENCES LLC undisclosed
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN DENNIS M. HERTEL & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
HENRY FORD MUSEUM AND GREENFIELD VILLAGE DENNIS M. HERTEL & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
NORTH FORK COMMUNITY POWER THE CRISCOM COMPANY undisclosed
CITY OF PALM DESERT THE CRISCOM COMPANY undisclosed
CITY OF HOLTVILLE THE CRISCOM COMPANY undisclosed
CITY OF CALABASAS THE CRISCOM COMPANY undisclosed
KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE THE CRISCOM COMPANY undisclosed
CITY OF AVENAL THE CRISCOM COMPANY undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026