H.J.Res. 1

H.J.Res. 1: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.

Reported by Committee Andy Biggs (R) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 1 is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would mandate that the Supreme Court consist of nine justices: one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices. This aims to ensure a stable and consistent size for the Court.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 1 argue that this amendment would preserve the integrity and tradition of the Supreme Court, preventing any future attempts to pack the Court with additional justices for political gain. Many view this as a safeguard for judicial independence and a return to a more balanced judiciary.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 1 contend that the amendment is unnecessary and could be seen as an attempt to limit the flexibility of the Court in responding to changing legal and societal needs. Some opponents argue that it may further entrench partisan divisions in the judicial system.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The bill H.J.Res. 1 proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding the composition of the Supreme Court, which does not have a direct correlation with the sponsor Andy Biggs' top donor industries, namely Health Professionals and Retired individuals. The total contributions from these industries amount to $157,500,000, but they do not appear to have a vested interest in the judicial structure of the Supreme Court. Additionally, the lobbying activity associated with this bill does not indicate any direct influence from industries that would typically align with the interests of Biggs' top donors. The absence of direct industry overlaps suggests that there is minimal risk of conflict of interest in this case.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. $600,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
ENVISION GROUP LLC MR. ANDREW FUTEY undisclosed
GESCONTI GROUP,INC. GESCONTI GROUP,INC. undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN LOGISTICS ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
TRACKONOMY SYSTEMS, INC. ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
HOLLY STRATEGIES INC. ON BEHALF OF 202 GROUP ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ST LOUIS BRACY TUCKER BROWN & VALANZANO DBA BROWN & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
EMAD EL SAID YOUSSEF SAAD EL-GALADA THROUGH BOLT CAPITAL, LP NEXUSONE CONSULTING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andy Biggs, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us