H.R. 9793

H.R. 9793: To amend title 28 to include additional limitations on the intentional tort exception, and for other purposes.

Introduced Brittany Pettersen (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9793 aims to amend Title 28 of the U.S. Code by introducing additional limitations on the intentional tort exception. This likely means that it seeks to restrict the circumstances under which individuals can sue the federal government for intentional torts, such as assault or defamation. The bill may also contain provisions related to other legal matters as indicated by 'and for other purposes.'

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9793 argue that the bill will help reduce frivolous lawsuits against the federal government, thus protecting taxpayer dollars and ensuring that resources are allocated more effectively. They believe that these limitations will encourage more responsible litigation practices.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9793 contend that the bill could unjustly limit individuals' rights to seek redress for intentional harms caused by federal employees. They warn that this could create barriers for victims of wrongful conduct, undermining accountability and justice.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9793, there is significant lobbying activity in the bill's policy area. Notably, CorMedix Inc. has contributed $220,000, which could indicate a vested interest in the outcomes of tort reform related to medical practices. Additionally, the Telecommunications Industry Association's $70,000 contribution suggests potential interests in liability limitations that could affect technology-related services. Although the absence of direct donor overlaps reduces the immediate risk, the substantial lobbying amounts indicate that there are external influences that could shape the bill's direction, warranting a medium risk assessment.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CORMEDIX INC. CORMEDIX INC. $220,000
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE $180,000
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $70,000
TERRANOVA INC FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
POSEIDON AEROSPACE FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
SAALEX CORPORATION FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
HERTHA METALS FRONTERA GROUP $15,000
MN8 ENERGY LLC MN8 ENERGY LLC $15,000
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION A LEARNED HAND, LLC $10,860
RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $10,000
VERMONT CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $8,000
AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURERS COALITION WILEY REIN LLP undisclosed
UNCAC COALITION UNCAC COALITION undisclosed
CFA INSTITUTE CFA INSTITUTE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brittany Pettersen, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us