H.R. 8724

H.R. 8724: To amend section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, to improve coordination, training, oversight, and utilization of excess Department of Defense property transferred for law enforcement activities, and for other purposes.

Introduced Andy Biggs (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8724 aims to amend existing laws regarding the transfer of excess Department of Defense (DoD) property to law enforcement agencies. The bill focuses on improving coordination between the DoD and law enforcement, enhancing training for law enforcement personnel on how to utilize this excess property, increasing oversight of how this property is used, and ensuring that the property is effectively utilized in law enforcement activities.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8724 have highlighted its potential to strengthen the relationship between military and local law enforcement, arguing that better training and oversight will lead to more effective use of resources. Proponents believe that improved coordination can enhance public safety and provide law enforcement with the necessary tools to address community needs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8724 express concern that increased military equipment and resources could lead to the militarization of police forces, potentially escalating tensions in communities. There are fears that without proper checks and balances, this could result in misuse of military-grade equipment and further erode trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The bill H.R. 8724, sponsored by Andy Biggs, aims to improve coordination, training, oversight, and utilization of excess Department of Defense property transferred for law enforcement activities. Biggs' top donor industries are Health Professionals and Retired individuals, with contributions amounting to $120,000,000 and $37,500,000 respectively. There is no direct overlap between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. Lobbying activity in the bill's policy area has been noted from various organizations, but none of these are directly linked to Biggs' top donors. Therefore, based on the available data, there is no evidence of a potential conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. CLARK STREET ASSOCIATES $30,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE LXR GROUP $25,000
BMWED/BRS/SMART-MD/PASSENGER RAIL/NCFOBJ MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, P.C. $16,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION INITIATIVE MICHAEL POWELSON $11,000
HEALTHY MARKETS ASSOCIATION LXR GROUP $10,000
UNIAO DA INDUSTRIA DE CANA-DE-AUCAR E BIOENERGIA (UNICA) BARRAL M JORGE CONSULTORES ASSOCIADOS LTDA $10,000
CONFEDERACAO NACIONAL DAS INSTITUICOES FINANCEIRAS BARRAL M JORGE CONSULTORES ASSOCIADOS LTDA $10,000
NATL ASSC OF STATE DIRECTORS OF CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION NATL ASSC OF STATE DIRECTORS OF CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION undisclosed
BRAZILIAN AVOCADO COMMISSION FEDERAL STRATEGIES GROUP, INC. undisclosed
SAAGA FEDERAL STRATEGIES GROUP, INC. undisclosed
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO undisclosed
THE GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, INC. KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC undisclosed
CLOUDTRUCKS INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
LOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
THE SCIENCE COALITION FORBES-TATE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andy Biggs, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us