S. 4953

S. 4953: A bill to amend the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to simplify the filing of Form 5500 for employee benefit plan administrators.

Introduced Jim Banks (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4953 aims to amend the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to make it easier for employee benefit plan administrators to file Form 5500. This form is essential for reporting information about employee benefit plans, and the bill seeks to simplify the filing process, potentially reducing administrative burdens and improving compliance.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4953 argue that simplifying the Form 5500 filing process will reduce the regulatory burden on employers and plan administrators, making it easier for them to comply with federal requirements. This could lead to increased participation in employee benefit plans, which is beneficial for workers seeking retirement security.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4953 express concern that simplifying the filing process may lead to less oversight and transparency in employee benefit plans. There are fears that easing these requirements could result in decreased accountability, potentially putting employees' retirement savings at risk.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The analysis of Bill S. 4953, aimed at amending the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to simplify Form 5500 filings, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Jim Banks' top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this area includes contributions from various entities, such as Olivet University ($61,099) and Henkel of America Inc. ($105,000), but these do not correlate directly with the bill's focus on employee benefit plan administration. The lack of direct financial ties suggests minimal risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the absence of overlapping interests indicates that the bill is likely being pursued for its intended policy benefits rather than donor influence.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
HENKEL OF AMERICA INC. HENKEL OF AMERICA INC. $105,000
OLIVET UNIVERSITY PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS & ARTHUR LLP $61,099
LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY MCALLISTER & QUINN, LLC $30,000
WILKES COUNTY ON BEHALF OF TOWN OF NORTH WILKESBORO, NC THE FERGUSON GROUP $20,000
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS REPUBLIC CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS REPUBLIC CONSULTING, LLC $5,000
WILKES COUNTY ON BEHALF OF TOWN OF WILKESBORO, NC THE FERGUSON GROUP undisclosed
DAVIS GEORGE CENTER MARKET STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
KERING AMERICAS, INC. CAPITOL KNOWLEDGE, LLC undisclosed
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP CENTER MARKET STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
WILKES COUNTY, NC THE FERGUSON GROUP undisclosed
DAVIS GEORGE CENTER MARKET STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
MASSIF MCALLISTER & QUINN, LLC undisclosed
HEALTHY MARKETS ASSOCIATION CENTER MARKET STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
LEWIS UNIVERSITY MCALLISTER & QUINN, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jim Banks, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us