H.Res. 1309

H.Res. 1309: Impeaching John Glover Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Introduced Steve Cohen (D) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1309 is a resolution aimed at impeaching John Glover Roberts, Jr., the Chief Justice of the United States, on the grounds of high crimes and misdemeanors. This resolution suggests that the actions or conduct of Chief Justice Roberts warrant impeachment proceedings, although specific charges or allegations are not detailed in the title alone.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets may view this resolution as a necessary step to hold judicial leaders accountable for their actions, emphasizing the importance of checks and balances within the government. Supporters might argue that it reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that no one, including high-ranking officials, is above accountability.

Negative Media Summary

Critics in the media may perceive this resolution as a politically motivated attack on the judiciary, suggesting that it undermines the independence of the judicial branch. There may be concerns that such actions could set a dangerous precedent for the impeachment process, leading to increased partisanship and instability within the government.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The analysis of H.Res. 1309, which seeks to impeach Chief Justice John Glover Roberts, Jr., reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Steve Cohen's top donors and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes a variety of organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial interest in the impeachment process itself. For instance, the National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities and the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems contributed $12,000 and $15,000 respectively, but their interests do not intersect with judicial matters. This lack of direct financial ties suggests that the motivations behind the bill are not influenced by campaign contributions from these sectors, leading to a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CLIQ, INC. F/K/A/ CARDFLEX, INC. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $180,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES $45,000
C STREET PROJECT VALENTINE STRATEGIES $30,000
NATIONAL WIC ASSOCIATION VALENTINE STRATEGIES $20,000
NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES $12,000
OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND ALLIANCE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND ALLIANCE undisclosed
EVER-GREEN ENERGY, INC. CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL HARDWOOD LUMBER ASSOCIATION CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
KIDNEY CARE PARTNERS CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
DELTA AIR LINES, INC. THEGROUP DC, LLC undisclosed
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC. THEGROUP DC, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONALS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONALS undisclosed
NEWSMAX MEDIA, INC THEGROUP DC, LLC undisclosed
AMGEN, INC. FEDERAL HEALTH COUNSEL, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Steve Cohen, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $200,000,000
Individuals: $200,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $62,500,000
Individuals: $62,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us