H.Res. 1128

H.Res. 1128: Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for the Department of Homeland Security.

Agreed To (Simple Resolution) Ryan Mackenzie (R) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1128 is a resolution from the House of Representatives expressing support for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It emphasizes the importance of ensuring DHS is fully funded, warns that lapses in funding put Americans at greater risk, and expresses gratitude to DHS employees for their dedication to protecting the United States.

Positive Media Summary

Positive media coverage highlights the resolution's focus on national security and the importance of consistent funding for DHS to ensure the safety of American citizens. Commentators have praised the acknowledgment of DHS employees' efforts and dedication, which is seen as a morale booster for the workforce.

Negative Media Summary

Negative media responses argue that the resolution lacks actionable measures and merely serves as a symbolic gesture without addressing underlying issues such as budget allocation inefficiencies or specific policy reforms. Critics also point out that the resolution does not address the broader debate over DHS's role and effectiveness in handling national security challenges.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

Based on the available data, there appears to be a low risk of conflict of interest between Representative Ryan Mackenzie's donors and the subject matter of H.Res. 1128. The bill expresses support for the Department of Homeland Security, and there are no direct overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter and the industries that are top donors to Representative Mackenzie. However, there is lobbying activity in the policy area of this bill, with various organizations and corporations having spent undisclosed amounts. The disclosed amounts total $62,000. It is important for voters to be aware of these lobbying activities, as they can influence the legislative process. However, without more specific information about the nature of this lobbying and the interests of the undisclosed donors, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions about potential conflicts of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TRIWEST HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC $50,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION $20,336
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC $20,000
ASSOCIATION OF JESUIT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES ASSOCIATION OF JESUIT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES $10,000
TRIDEUM CORP ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC $10,000
ALASKA STRUCTURES ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC $10,000
HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC OBO AANA ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC $6,000
SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE RESOURCES ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC $6,000
CENTRAL OKLAHOMA TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING AUTHORITY CARDINAL INFRASTRUCTURE LLC undisclosed
FRIENDS OF FORT RUCKER ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC undisclosed
STELLA-JONES CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MCFARLAND CASCADE HOLDINGS, INC.) STELLA-JONES CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MCFARLAND CASCADE HOLDINGS, INC.) undisclosed
PALLADYNE AI ATLANTIC STRATEGIES GROUP LLC undisclosed
BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC (ON BEHALF OF SENTRY VIEW SYSTEMS, INC.) ERVIN GRAVES STRATEGY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
CAMPAIGN FOR FAMILY FARMS AND THE ENVIRONMENT PATRICIA LOVERA undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us
Congressional Votes
On the Resolution
House · Mar 26, 2026
Passed
225
YEA
187
NAY
20
NOT VOTING

Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.