H.R. 175: Deport Alien Gang Members Act

The Deport Alien Gang Members Act aims to make it easier to deport non-U.S. nationals who are associated with criminal gangs. Under this bill, individuals identified as gang members or those involved in gang activities would be denied entry into the U.S. and could be deported. The bill requires mandatory detention for these individuals and eliminates their eligibility for asylum and other forms of legal status unless they cooperate with law enforcement. It also defines a criminal gang and sets up a process for the Department of Homeland Security to officially designate groups as gangs.

Supporters of the Deport Alien Gang Members Act argue that the bill is a necessary measure to enhance public safety and combat gang violence in the U.S. They believe that by removing gang members from the country, communities will be safer and that the legislation will deter criminal activities associated with gangs. Proponents highlight the need for stricter immigration policies to protect citizens from the impacts of gang-related crime.

Critics of the Deport Alien Gang Members Act express concerns that the bill could lead to unjust deportations and violate the rights of individuals who may be falsely labeled as gang members. They argue that the bill's broad definitions and mandatory detention provisions could disproportionately affect immigrant communities and exacerbate fears of law enforcement among those seeking refuge. Opponents also warn that the legislation may not effectively address the root causes of gang violence and could instead contribute to a cycle of criminalization.

The Deport Alien Gang Members Act, sponsored by Tom McClintock, presents potential conflicts of interest primarily due to the significant contributions from the 'Retired' industry, which amounts to $75,000,000. This industry overlaps with the bill's subject matter, as it pertains to immigration policies that could affect retired individuals and their communities. While the majority of McClintock's funding comes from health professionals, the substantial donations from the retired sector raise questions about the motivations behind the bill and whether it serves the interests of these donors. The lack of transparency in lobbying activities further complicates the situation, as several lobbying groups are involved without disclosed financial ties to the bill's subject matter.

Voters should be aware that the financial backing from the retired sector could influence McClintock's stance on immigration policies, potentially prioritizing donor interests over the broader public good. The total overlap amount of $75,000,000 indicates a significant financial interest that could sway legislative decisions. This situation warrants scrutiny, as it may reflect a prioritization of donor interests over constituents' needs.

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Top industries funding Tom McClintock, ranked by total contributions.

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)