H.R. 9636

H.R. 9636: To amend the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 to require labor organizations to include results of certain audits in financial reports, and for other purposes.

Introduced Robert Onder (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9636 proposes amendments to the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, requiring labor organizations to include the results of specific audits in their financial reports. This aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the financial dealings of labor unions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9636 argue that the bill promotes greater transparency within labor organizations, ensuring that members have access to important financial information. Proponents believe this will build trust between union leadership and their members, potentially strengthening labor organizations by fostering accountability.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9636 express concerns that the additional reporting requirements could impose unnecessary burdens on labor organizations, potentially diverting resources from their primary functions. Some argue that this legislation may be an attempt to weaken unions by increasing scrutiny and compliance costs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The analysis of H.R. 9636, sponsored by Robert Onder, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill seeks to amend the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, focusing on labor organizations and their financial reporting requirements. While there is significant lobbying activity in this policy area, with notable contributions such as $80,000 from the American Concrete Institute and $60,000 from Anne Pramaggiore, these entities do not have a direct stake in labor organization audits. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest appears limited. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not directly connect to the bill's intent or the sponsor's financial backers.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $80,000
ANNE PRAMAGGIORE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $60,000
SIGHTLINE INTELLIGENCE C2 STRATEGIES $50,000
ACTUS ADVANCED SYSTEMS C2 STRATEGIES $40,000
WASHOE COUNTY PORTER GROUP, LLC $30,000
VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS, INC. C2 STRATEGIES $30,000
EO SOLUTIONS LLC PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
ULINE BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES $20,000
RTC SOUTHERN NEVADA PORTER GROUP, LLC $10,000
WISH BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN STATE CRANBERRY GROWERS ASSOCIATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WD SCHORSCH LLC BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Robert Onder, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $160,000,000
Individuals: $160,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $50,000,000
Individuals: $50,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us