H.R. 9590

H.R. 9590: To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on alternative habitat for certain manatees, and for other purposes.

Introduced Daniel Webster (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9590 is a bill that directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on alternative habitats for certain manatees. The purpose of the study is likely to identify and assess new or modified habitats that could support manatee populations, which are facing challenges due to environmental changes and habitat loss.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the bill as a proactive step towards the conservation of manatees, emphasizing the importance of protecting endangered species and their habitats. Supporters argue that the study could lead to effective strategies for enhancing manatee survival and fostering biodiversity.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have raised concerns that the bill may divert resources from immediate conservation efforts needed to address the current threats to manatees. Some argue that the study could delay necessary actions and that the focus should be on enforcing existing protections rather than conducting additional research.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$1,260,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

The analysis of H.R. 9590, which focuses on conducting a study on alternative habitat for certain manatees, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the top donor industries of the sponsor, Daniel Webster. His largest donor industries are Health Professionals, contributing $960 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $300 million. These industries do not have a clear connection to environmental or wildlife conservation issues, which diminishes the likelihood of a conflict of interest regarding this bill. Furthermore, while there is lobbying activity in the policy area, it does not appear to directly influence the sponsor's financial backers, as the lobbying entities do not align with the sponsor's top donor industries. Therefore, the risk of conflict is assessed as low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC $60,000
CREA MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $60,000
WENDOVER HOUSING PARTNERS MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
INLAND GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
CITY OF GRESHAM, OREGON FRONTLINE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $21,000
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF STRATA CRITICAL INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF PHANTOM NEURO INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
AAV, LTD. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
EXPLORER AIRCRAFT, INC. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF KTA-TATOR, INC. INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO GLOBAL BUSINESS TRAVEL ASSOCIATION DININO ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF MAIN LINE HEALTH INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
PRESLER PERSISTENCE LLC FRONTLINE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Daniel Webster, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $960,000,000
Individuals: $960,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $300,000,000
Individuals: $300,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us