H.R. 3831

H.R. 3831: Florida Safe Seas Act of 2025

Passed House Daniel Webster (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Florida Safe Seas Act of 2025 prohibits feeding sharks in the U.S. waters off the coast of Florida, except for specific exceptions like federally funded research or if it poses no health or safety risks. This law applies to the Exclusive Economic Zone, which extends up to 200 miles from the coast.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Florida Safe Seas Act of 2025 praise it as a crucial step in protecting shark populations and promoting marine conservation. Environmental advocates highlight the bill's potential to enhance public safety and preserve the natural ecosystem by reducing human-shark interactions.

Negative Media Summary

Critics argue that the Florida Safe Seas Act of 2025 may hinder legitimate research and educational programs that utilize shark feeding as a tool for studying marine life. Some stakeholders in the tourism industry express concerns that the bill could negatively impact activities like shark diving, which are popular among tourists.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$1,260,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The Florida Safe Seas Act of 2025, sponsored by Daniel Webster, does not exhibit any direct industry overlaps with the sponsor's top donor industries, which include Health Professionals and Retired individuals, totaling $1.26 billion. Given that the bill's subject matter does not align with the interests of these donor industries, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Furthermore, while there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the lack of disclosed financial ties to the specific industries of the bill suggests that the influence of these lobbyists may not directly benefit the sponsor's financial backers. Voters should be aware that while there is substantial funding from health professionals, it does not seem to directly impact the legislative intent of this bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. $600,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
ENVISION GROUP LLC MR. ANDREW FUTEY undisclosed
GESCONTI GROUP,INC. GESCONTI GROUP,INC. undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN LOGISTICS ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
TRACKONOMY SYSTEMS, INC. ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
HOLLY STRATEGIES INC. ON BEHALF OF 202 GROUP ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ST LOUIS BRACY TUCKER BROWN & VALANZANO DBA BROWN & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
EMAD EL SAID YOUSSEF SAAD EL-GALADA THROUGH BOLT CAPITAL, LP NEXUSONE CONSULTING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Daniel Webster, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $960,000,000
Individuals: $960,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $300,000,000
Individuals: $300,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us