H.R. 9524

H.R. 9524: To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to seek to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and to provide for coordination between the Secretaries in the administration of the Veterans Commu

Introduced Gregory Murphy (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9524 directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to work with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to create a memorandum of understanding. This agreement aims to improve coordination between the two departments in managing the Veterans Community Care Program, which provides healthcare services to veterans.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9524 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance collaboration between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Health and Human Services. They argue that this coordination could lead to better healthcare outcomes for veterans, ensuring they receive timely and effective medical services.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9524 have expressed concerns that the bill may not go far enough in addressing systemic issues within the Veterans Community Care Program. Some argue that merely facilitating coordination between departments does not tackle the underlying problems veterans face, such as access to care and service quality.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9524, sponsored by Gregory Murphy, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill focuses on coordination between the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, which does not appear to directly benefit any specific donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes a variety of organizations, such as Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc., which have contributed significant amounts ($20,000 and $60,000 respectively). However, these contributions do not correlate directly with the bill's objectives, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should note that while there is lobbying activity, it does not suggest a direct influence on the legislation being proposed.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Gregory Murphy, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us