H.R. 10004

H.R. 10004: To amend title 10, United States Code, to incorporate requirements for data centers for the protection of water resources, and for other purposes.

Introduced Hillary Scholten (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 10004 aims to amend Title 10 of the United States Code to establish new requirements for data centers regarding the protection of water resources. This likely involves regulations or guidelines that data centers must follow to ensure they do not negatively impact water quality or availability.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 10004 argue that the bill is a crucial step towards sustainable practices in the tech industry, emphasizing the importance of protecting water resources in an era of increasing environmental concerns. They highlight that the legislation could lead to more responsible data center operations, which is beneficial for both the environment and local communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 10004 express concerns that the new requirements could impose excessive regulations on data centers, potentially stifling innovation and economic growth in the tech sector. Some argue that the bill may create unnecessary burdens for businesses, especially smaller data center operators, which could lead to higher operational costs and reduced competitiveness.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 10004, sponsored by Hillary Scholten, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill focuses on amending title 10 of the United States Code to incorporate requirements for data centers to protect water resources. Given that the sponsor's top donor industries do not relate to environmental regulations or data center operations, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. The absence of financial ties to industries that would benefit or be adversely affected by the bill suggests that the sponsor's legislative intentions are unlikely to be influenced by donor interests. Voters should be aware that while campaign contributions can sometimes lead to conflicts, in this case, the lack of overlap indicates a low risk of undue influence.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Hillary Scholten, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us