H.R. 8866

H.R. 8866: To amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to reauthorize the regional innovation program, and for other purposes.

Introduced Haley Stevens (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8866 aims to amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to extend the regional innovation program. This program is designed to promote technological innovation and economic development in various regions of the United States by supporting collaboration between public and private sectors, educational institutions, and local communities.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8866 have praised the bill for its potential to stimulate economic growth and enhance innovation across different regions. They argue that reauthorizing the regional innovation program will help create jobs, foster entrepreneurship, and ensure that technological advancements benefit a wider array of communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8866 have expressed concerns that the bill may not adequately address the needs of underserved regions and could lead to unequal distribution of resources. Some argue that the focus on regional innovation might divert attention and funding away from other critical areas of technological development and education.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Science, Technology, Communications

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 8866, there is notable lobbying activity in related areas that could indicate potential conflicts of interest. For instance, Paratek Pharmaceuticals contributed $20,000, and Steelships, LLC contributed $45,000, both of which are involved in sectors that could benefit from technology innovation and regional programs. This raises questions about whether these contributions could influence the bill's outcomes in favor of these donors. Voters should be aware that while the direct connections may not be evident, the financial ties to lobbying efforts in the technology and healthcare sectors suggest a need for scrutiny.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
STEELSHIPS, LLC CONSCIENCE POINT CONSULTING, INC. $45,000
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $30,000
PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS $20,000
SAN JUAN SOUTHERN PAIUTE TRIBE THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $15,000
CHURCH ALLIANCE K&L GATES, LLP $10,000
GIFDA RULON & WHITE GOVERNANCE STRATEGIES $10,000
ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY undisclosed
PHARMATROPHIX, INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) undisclosed
PGA TOUR, INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) undisclosed
RESPONSIVE GOV ACTION THE RABEN GROUP undisclosed
KERECIS INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
BINTI, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
VERTIV GROUP CORPORATION AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
TERRA-GEN, LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
PHILIPS CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Haley Stevens, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us