H.R. 9161

H.R. 9161: To require the United States International Trade Commission to investigate national security concerns regarding the exportation of aluminum scrap to countries of concern, and for other purposes.

Introduced Haley Stevens (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9161 mandates the United States International Trade Commission to conduct an investigation into national security risks associated with exporting aluminum scrap to countries identified as potential threats. The bill aims to assess whether these exports could compromise U.S. security interests and to explore measures to mitigate any identified risks.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9161 have praised the bill for taking proactive steps to protect national security. They argue that investigating the exportation of aluminum scrap to potentially adversarial nations is crucial for safeguarding American interests and ensuring that critical materials do not end up in the hands of those who may use them against the U.S.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9161 have expressed concerns that the bill may unnecessarily restrict trade and harm U.S. aluminum businesses. They argue that the investigation could lead to overregulation and that the bill may be based on unfounded fears rather than concrete evidence of security threats, potentially disrupting a key industry.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Foreign Trade and International Finance

The analysis of H.R. 9161, sponsored by Haley Stevens, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter concerning aluminum scrap exportation and the sponsor's top donor industries. This indicates a lower likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from the financial contributions to the sponsor. While there is notable lobbying activity in the policy area, the undisclosed nature of these activities limits the ability to assess their potential influence on the bill. Voters should be aware that while there are entities lobbying in this space, the lack of direct financial ties to the sponsor's donors suggests a minimal risk of undue influence on the legislative process.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Haley Stevens, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us