H.R. 8322: To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 through April 30, 2026, and for other purposes.

H.R. 8322 is a bill that proposes to extend the authorities granted under title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, which were initially amended by the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. This extension would continue these authorities until April 30, 2026. Title VII of FISA primarily deals with the surveillance of foreign targets outside the United States and includes provisions for government agencies to collect foreign intelligence information. The bill may also include other related provisions, although these are not specified in the title.

Supporters of H.R. 8322 argue that extending the authorities of title VII of FISA is crucial for national security. They emphasize that these provisions enable U.S. intelligence agencies to effectively monitor foreign threats and gather essential intelligence to protect the country from terrorism and other international dangers. Proponents highlight that the extension ensures continuity in intelligence operations and maintains the legal framework necessary for modern surveillance activities.

Critics of H.R. 8322 express concerns about privacy and civil liberties, arguing that the extension of FISA's title VII authorities could lead to continued overreach and potential abuse of surveillance powers. They worry that the broad scope of these authorities might infringe on the rights of individuals, including incidental collection of communications involving U.S. citizens. Opponents call for increased oversight and transparency to prevent misuse and to protect citizens' privacy rights.

Based on the available data, there appear to be no direct conflicts of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. The sponsor, Austin Scott, does not have any top donor industries that overlap with the policy area of the bill, which is to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not involve any of the sponsor's top donors. Therefore, there is no evidence of a money trail leading from the sponsor's donors to this specific bill. Voters should be aware that this does not necessarily mean there are no conflicts of interest at all, but none have been detected based on the current data.

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Top industries funding Austin Scott, ranked by total contributions.

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)