H.J.Res. 169

H.J.Res. 169: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Consumer Financial Protection C

Introduced Nydia Velázquez (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 169 is a joint resolution that aims to disapprove a rule issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) concerning the withdrawal of an existing consumer financial protection regulation. Essentially, this bill seeks to prevent the CFPB from retracting certain protections that were put in place for consumers in financial transactions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 169 argue that the resolution is necessary to maintain essential consumer protections that safeguard individuals from unfair financial practices. They emphasize the importance of ensuring that the CFPB remains accountable to the public and that consumers continue to have robust protections in place.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 169 contend that the resolution undermines the CFPB's ability to adapt regulations based on current economic conditions and consumer needs. They warn that disapproving the withdrawal of the rule could lead to outdated protections that do not reflect the realities of today's financial landscape, potentially harming consumers rather than helping them.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

Based on the available data, there are no direct overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The sponsor, Nydia Velázquez, has received significant contributions from Health Professionals and Retired individuals, but these industries do not appear to have a direct interest in the bill relating to Consumer Financial Protection. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not involve any of the sponsor's top donors. Therefore, there is a low risk of conflicts of interest. It's important for voters to know that the absence of direct industry overlaps does not necessarily mean there are no conflicts of interest, but in this case, the risk appears to be low based on the information provided.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. MO STRATEGIES, INC. $350,000
RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VENN STRATEGIES $60,000
BLOCKCHAIN ASSOCIATION ZERO ONE STRATEGIES $50,000
MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE US, LLC MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE US, LLC $30,000
CLARK STREET ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $30,000
IMPERIAL HEALTH MCWILLIAMS GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS CONSULTANTS $20,000
WILLIAMS & LAKE, LLC MCWILLIAMS GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS CONSULTANTS $20,000
KICKAPOO TRADITIONAL TRIBE OF TEXAS MCWILLIAMS GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS CONSULTANTS $20,000
CITY OF KOTZEBUE, ALASKA HOLLAND & HART LLP $10,000
SPACE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE, INC. SPACE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE, INC. undisclosed
MCKEES ROCKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CRANMER CONSULTANTS undisclosed
LYTEN, INC. JHS CONSULTING, INC undisclosed
SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY undisclosed
PRESERVATION ACTION PRESERVATION ACTION undisclosed
GOLD PR LTD. (ON BEHALF OF OJSC "BAKAI BANK") THROUGHLINE GLOBAL ADVISORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nydia Velázquez, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us