TN HB0652

Planning Regulations

Introduced House Tim Hicks (R)
Plain English Summary

This bill proposes that local governments in Tennessee cannot require more than one entrance and exit point for new subdivisions unless those subdivisions have at least 70 homes. This change aims to simplify planning regulations for smaller developments. It amends several sections of the Tennessee Code to reflect this new requirement.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it will reduce unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles for developers, making it easier to build new homes and meet housing demands. They believe this will promote economic growth and encourage the development of smaller communities by allowing more flexibility in planning.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill contend that limiting the number of required access points could pose safety risks for residents in case of emergencies. They argue that proper planning is essential for ensuring public safety and that the bill undermines local governments' ability to regulate development effectively.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
8/10
Risk Level
High
Policy Area
Housing and Community Development
Industry Overlap
50%
Personal Conflicts
2 found

The proposed bill HB0652, which limits the requirements for ingress and egress in new subdivisions, could significantly impact the construction industry, particularly those involved in residential development. Tim Hicks, the sponsor of the bill, owns Hicks Construction, a business that operates within the general contracting industry. This presents a direct alignment between his personal financial interests and the bill's potential effects. As a general contractor, Hicks Construction could benefit from reduced regulatory requirements, potentially lowering costs and increasing profitability for projects involving subdivisions with fewer than 70 residential dwellings. Additionally, Hicks is associated with Cedar Mills Development GP, which may also be involved in real estate development, further aligning his interests with the bill's impact on housing and community development.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Owner of Hicks Construction AI-researched
Business Owner Owner of Hicks Construction General Contractors AI-researched
Employer HICKS CONSTRUCTION General Contractors TN Ethics Commission
Employer TS PARTNERSHIP TN Ethics Commission
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer HICKS FAMILY TRUST TN Ethics Commission
Employer RENTAL INCOME TN Ethics Commission
Employer CEDAR MILLS DEVELOPEMENT GP TN Ethics Commission
Employer TTSJ PARTNERSHIP TN Ethics Commission
Asset NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Other, CONTRACTORS LICENSE TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: TIM PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.