S. 5030

S. 5030: A bill to amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group or individual heal

Introduced Roger Marshall (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

Senate Bill 5030, introduced on July 16, 2026, aims to amend existing health laws to require health insurance plans that cover gender transition procedures to also cover treatments addressing any harms caused by such procedures. This includes services to restore healthy human form and functioning as much as possible. ([quiverquant.com](https://www.quiverquant.com/bills/119/s-5030?utm_source=openai))

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the bill argue that it ensures comprehensive care for individuals who experience complications or regret following gender transition procedures. They believe it promotes patient well-being by mandating insurance coverage for necessary restorative treatments.

Negative Media Summary

Critics contend that the bill could stigmatize transgender individuals by implying that transition procedures are inherently harmful. They also express concern that it may lead to increased insurance costs and potential barriers to accessing gender-affirming care.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of Bill S. 5030, which aims to amend health-related legislation, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Roger Marshall's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donors primarily represent industries such as agriculture, energy, and construction, which do not have a direct stake in health insurance or group health plans. While there is significant lobbying activity in the health sector, particularly from the American Dental Association with a notable contribution of $1,100,000, it does not directly correlate with the sponsor's financial backers. The absence of overlapping interests suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest in this instance. However, the substantial lobbying amounts indicate that external influences may still be at play, which voters should be aware of.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION $1,100,000
CELLEBRITE INC. CELLEBRITE INC. $70,000
ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE $55,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE $25,000
AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE ASSOCIATION EDMUND GRABER $20,000
MATERIALS RESEARCH SOCIETY HILLSTAFFER, LLC $15,000
NAFA FLEET MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HILLSTAFFER, LLC $15,000
BETTENDORF IA EDMUND GRABER $10,000
NATIONAL UTILITY CONTRACTORS ASSN EDMUND GRABER $10,000
ILLINOIS PUBLIC TRANSIT ASSN EDMUND GRABER $10,000
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION undisclosed
FMC CORPORATION RED FLAG CONSULTING USA(FORMALLY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-GOVERNMENT COUNSELLORS, INC) undisclosed
ASSOCIATION FOR DIPLOMATIC STUDIES AND TRAINING HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed
THE ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION ASSOCIATION, INC HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Roger Marshall, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us