S. 5011

S. 5011: A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose an excise tax on excessively disparate wages paid to chief executive officers.

Introduced Sheldon Whitehouse (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 5011 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code to introduce an excise tax on companies that pay their chief executive officers (CEOs) excessively high wages compared to the wages of their average employees. The intent of the bill is to address income inequality and promote fairer wage distribution within corporations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 5011 argue that the bill is a necessary step towards reducing income inequality in the U.S. They highlight that by imposing an excise tax on excessively high CEO compensation, the legislation encourages companies to adopt more equitable pay structures and ensures that the benefits of corporate success are shared more broadly among employees.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 5011 contend that the bill could discourage companies from investing in growth and innovation. They argue that the excise tax on high CEO wages may lead to unintended consequences, such as companies relocating to avoid the tax or reducing overall employment. Some also view the bill as government overreach into corporate compensation practices.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of bill S. 5011, which aims to impose an excise tax on excessively disparate wages paid to CEOs, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Sheldon Whitehouse's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donors do not appear to have a vested interest in CEO wage disparities, suggesting limited potential for conflicts of interest. Furthermore, while there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from these entities do not directly relate to the bill's focus on wage disparity among executives. For example, CorMedix Inc. contributed $220,000, but their interests do not align with the specific provisions of this legislation. Therefore, the risk of conflict is assessed as low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CORMEDIX INC. CORMEDIX INC. $220,000
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE $180,000
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $70,000
TERRANOVA INC FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
POSEIDON AEROSPACE FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
SAALEX CORPORATION FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
HERTHA METALS FRONTERA GROUP $15,000
MN8 ENERGY LLC MN8 ENERGY LLC $15,000
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION A LEARNED HAND, LLC $10,860
RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $10,000
VERMONT CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $8,000
AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURERS COALITION WILEY REIN LLP undisclosed
UNCAC COALITION UNCAC COALITION undisclosed
CFA INSTITUTE CFA INSTITUTE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sheldon Whitehouse, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $1,800,000,000
Individuals: $1,800,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $562,500,000
Individuals: $562,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us