S. 4538

S. 4538: A bill to amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating Washington’s Trail-1753 as a national historic trail, and for other purposes.

Introduced John Fetterman (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4538 is a bill that aims to amend the National Trails System Act. It directs the Secretary of the Interior to study whether Washington’s Trail-1753 should be designated as a national historic trail. This designation would recognize the trail's historical significance and potentially lead to its preservation and promotion.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4538 have praised the bill for its potential to preserve an important piece of American history. They argue that designating Washington’s Trail-1753 as a national historic trail would enhance public awareness of the trail's significance and promote tourism and education related to the historical events associated with it.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4538 have expressed concerns about the potential costs associated with the study and the subsequent designation. Some argue that resources could be better allocated to more pressing conservation efforts, and there are worries about the impact of increased foot traffic on the trail's natural environment.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The analysis of bill S. 4538, which aims to study the feasibility of designating Washington’s Trail-1753 as a national historic trail, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor John Fetterman's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area primarily involves health-related organizations and energy sectors, which do not directly relate to the preservation or designation of national trails. The highest disclosed contribution is $30,000 from HEALTHTECH PARTNERS, but this does not indicate a conflict with the bill's objectives. Overall, the lack of direct financial ties to the bill's subject matter suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES $45,000
HEALTHTECH PARTNERS, HEALTHSPERIEN $30,000
C STREET PROJECT VALENTINE STRATEGIES $30,000
NATIONAL WIC ASSOCIATION VALENTINE STRATEGIES $20,000
NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES $12,000
NATIONAL MANAGED LONG TERM SUPPORTS AND SERVICES HEALTH PLAN ASSOCIATION HEALTHSPERIEN undisclosed
OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND ALLIANCE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND ALLIANCE undisclosed
EVER-GREEN ENERGY, INC. CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL HARDWOOD LUMBER ASSOCIATION CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
KIDNEY CARE PARTNERS CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
DELTA AIR LINES, INC. THEGROUP DC, LLC undisclosed
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC. THEGROUP DC, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONALS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONALS undisclosed
NEWSMAX MEDIA, INC THEGROUP DC, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us