S. 4477

S. 4477: A bill to repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act.

Introduced Mike Lee (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4477 is a bill that aims to repeal the wage requirements established by the Davis-Bacon Act. This Act mandates that workers on federal construction projects be paid at least the prevailing wage for similar jobs in the area. By repealing these requirements, the bill would allow for potentially lower wages for laborers on these projects.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4477 argue that repealing the wage requirements will reduce costs for federal construction projects, allowing more projects to be funded and completed. They believe this could lead to increased job opportunities and economic growth, particularly in regions where construction projects are vital for infrastructure development.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4477 express concern that repealing the Davis-Bacon wage requirements could lead to exploitation of workers, resulting in lower wages and poorer working conditions. They argue that this move undermines labor standards and could diminish the quality of work on federal projects, ultimately harming the economy and workers' rights.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The analysis of bill S. 4477, which aims to repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Mike Lee's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the wage requirements of federal construction projects, which is the primary focus of the Davis-Bacon Act. Although there is significant lobbying activity in related areas, such as natural resources and recycling, these do not directly connect to the wage requirements being addressed in this bill. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as the financial contributions do not suggest a direct influence on the legislation being proposed.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA LLC JOHN MCENTEE $225,000
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION $180,000
PARKER MEGGITT PARKER MEGGITT $100,000
GUIDESTAR ELDERCARE LOPER CONSULTING LLC $40,000
GERSHOW RECYCLING CORPORATION BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
PACE UNIVERSITY BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
NATURA RESOURCES BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
TOSHIBA CORPORATION BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $18,000
AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
NATIONAL RETIREE LEGISLATIVE NETWORK ALYSON PARKER $15,000
TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $10,000
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TWO RIVERS LLC $6,000
JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION CARTER LAWS & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Lee, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us