S. 4456

S. 4456: A bill to require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security to require a license for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of certain integrated circuits, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jim Banks (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4456 is a bill that aims to strengthen U.S. export controls by requiring a license for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of certain integrated circuits. This measure is likely intended to enhance national security and prevent sensitive technology from falling into the hands of adversaries.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4456 argue that the bill is a crucial step in safeguarding U.S. technological advancements and national security. They highlight that by regulating the export of integrated circuits, the bill can help protect critical infrastructure and maintain a competitive edge in the global market.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4456 express concerns that the bill may hinder innovation and collaboration in the tech industry. They argue that stringent export controls could disrupt supply chains and negatively impact U.S. companies that rely on international partnerships, potentially leading to economic drawbacks.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Foreign Trade and International Finance

The bill S. 4456, sponsored by Jim Banks, is related to the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of certain integrated circuits. The top donor industries for Jim Banks are Health Professionals and Retired individuals, with donations amounting to $240,000,000 and $75,000,000 respectively. There is no direct overlap detected between these industries and the subject matter of the bill, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. However, there has been lobbying activity in this bill's policy area by various entities, with the highest amount being $60,000 by multiple parties. It should be noted that these lobbying entities do not directly align with the sponsor's top donor industries, further reducing the likelihood of a conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $65,000
FEDERATED INDIANS OF THE GRATON RANCHERIA PACE, LLP $60,000
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA PACE, LLP $60,000
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
QUAPAW NATION PACE, LLP $50,000
CA STATE ASSEMBLY PACE, LLP $50,000
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI PACE, LLP $40,000
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS PACE, LLP $35,000
PENOBSCOT NATION PACE, LLP $30,000
COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $30,000
KARUK TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
NAPA VALLEY VINTNERS ASSOCIATION PACE, LLP $20,000
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
WEST LOS ANGELES VETERANS' COLLECTIVE PACE, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jim Banks, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us