S. 1003

S. 1003: Lulu’s Law

Passed Both Chambers Katie Britt (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

Lulu's Law is a bill that directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to allow the transmission of wireless emergency alerts specifically for shark attacks. This would enable government authorities to send alerts to mobile phones about shark attacks, similar to how they currently send alerts for other emergencies like severe weather or missing children.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised Lulu's Law for its proactive approach to public safety, highlighting the importance of timely information during potential shark attack incidents. Supporters argue that this legislation could help save lives by ensuring that people are aware of imminent dangers while at the beach.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have raised concerns about the practicality and necessity of Lulu's Law, suggesting that the likelihood of shark attacks is relatively low compared to other emergencies. Some commentators argue that this could lead to unnecessary panic or desensitization to alerts, detracting from more pressing public safety issues.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Science, Technology, Communications

The analysis of Bill S. 1003, Lulu's Law, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Katie Britt's top donor industries and the subjects addressed in the bill. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL amount to $100,000, which is notable but does not indicate a direct conflict with the bill's intent. The lobbying groups involved, such as DIGITALEUROPE and the INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, have undisclosed financial interests, making it difficult to ascertain their influence on the bill. However, without direct financial ties to the bill's content, the risk of conflict remains low. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the absence of direct donor overlaps suggests that the bill may not be unduly influenced by specific donor interests.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION $100,000
CEO WORKS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $45,000
KAZI IG SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $15,000
SOUTHERN FOLGER CONTRACTING BBT STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
WATERFRONT GLOBAL BBT STRATEGIES LLC $5,200
DIGITALEUROPE VIVID STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
DR. STEPHEN SOLOWAY MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ONE ISRAEL FUND MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HEMOGLOBIN OXYGEN THERAPEUTICS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ATAOLLAH AMINPOUR MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HERSEL NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MORAD BEN NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MARK SCOTT MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
BORIS MINTS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us
Congressional Votes
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
House · May 20, 2026
Passed
401
YEA
6
NAY
23
NOT VOTING

Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.