H.Res. 1286

H.Res. 1286: Calling for a trade policy that supports workers, consumers, independent farmers, small businesses, and the environment.

Introduced Rosa DeLauro (D) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1286 is a resolution that advocates for a trade policy in the United States that prioritizes the needs of workers, consumers, independent farmers, small businesses, and environmental protection. The resolution likely calls for trade agreements and practices that are fair and equitable, ensuring that these groups are supported in the global marketplace.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.Res. 1286 have praised the resolution for its focus on creating a trade policy that benefits everyday Americans, particularly those in vulnerable sectors like agriculture and small business. Media outlets have highlighted the importance of prioritizing environmental sustainability and worker rights in trade discussions, viewing the resolution as a step towards more equitable economic practices.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.Res. 1286 argue that the resolution may lead to protectionist trade policies that could hinder economic growth and competitiveness. Some media reports have expressed concerns that emphasizing the needs of specific groups could result in negative consequences for broader economic relationships and international trade agreements, potentially leading to increased prices for consumers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Foreign Trade and International Finance

The analysis of H.Res. 1286, which calls for a trade policy that supports workers, consumers, independent farmers, small businesses, and the environment, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the top donor industries of sponsor Rosa DeLauro. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the donors listed do not appear to have a direct financial interest that conflicts with the bill's objectives. For example, BAMCO LLC contributed $110,000, and the Transportation Communications National Union/IAM contributed $70,000, but their interests do not directly oppose the bill's intent to support workers and small businesses. Therefore, the risk of conflict is assessed as low, as there are no clear financial incentives that would suggest a conflict of interest for the sponsor.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
BAMCO LLC CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $110,000
TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATIONS NATIONAL UNION/IAM (FKA TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATI TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATIONS NATIONAL UNION/IAM (FKA TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATI $70,000
MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED $20,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS HARO SOLUTIONS LLC $10,000
INTERCOMP COMPANY BROMELKAMP GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC $10,000
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION 1607 STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GIFTED CHILDREN JENNIFER MADSEN undisclosed
AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE LLC AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, LLC undisclosed
GALVANIZE THERAPEUTICS, INC. JEFFREY J. KIMBELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. undisclosed
NEURALINK CORP. JEFFREY J. KIMBELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. undisclosed
CAPITOL COUNSEL LLC ON BEHALF OF SKYVAULT AI LLC MICHAEL J. LAMOUREUX undisclosed
PRECISION IMPACTS, LLC THORN RUN PARTNERS undisclosed
CITY OF FREDERICK OKLAHOMA BROMELKAMP GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC undisclosed
TWINLOGIC STRATEGIES ON BEHALF OF PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS WINN STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
MONUMENT HILLS PARTNERS, LLC THE BERNHARDT GROUP LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Rosa DeLauro, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us