H.R. 9751

H.R. 9751: To amend the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to establish additional requirements relating to claims and appeals.

Introduced Summer Lee (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9751 aims to amend the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by introducing new requirements for handling claims and appeals related to employee retirement plans. This likely includes provisions to enhance transparency, fairness, and efficiency in the claims process for individuals seeking benefits from retirement plans.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9751 argue that the bill will strengthen protections for employees by ensuring that claims and appeals are processed fairly and transparently. Advocates express that this can lead to increased trust in retirement systems and better outcomes for workers who rely on these benefits.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9751 raise concerns that the additional requirements could impose burdensome regulations on employers and plan administrators, potentially leading to increased costs and administrative complexities. Some argue that this could unintentionally limit the availability of retirement plans or discourage employers from offering them.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9751, which aims to amend the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, indicates no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Summer Lee, and her top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes contributions from various organizations, such as the American Academy of Home Care Medicine ($70,000) and Marshfield Clinic Health System ($60,000), but these do not directly relate to the bill's subject matter. The absence of overlapping donor industries suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest, as the financial support does not appear to influence the legislative intent behind the bill. Voters should be aware that while there is significant lobbying activity, it does not directly connect to the sponsor's financial backers, indicating a separation between donor interests and the proposed legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $70,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM $60,000
COALITION FOR THE USE OF SAFE AND EFFICIENT REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC $20,000
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP $10,000
NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION $5,000
ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) undisclosed
SYSTEMS & METHODS, INC. CAPROCK STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
TIGERSWAN ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
LWRC INTERNATIONAL, LLC ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed
RMS OF GEORGIA, LLC D/B/A CHOICE REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC undisclosed
BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORP HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Summer Lee, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $600,000,000
Individuals: $600,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $187,500,000
Individuals: $187,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us