H.R. 9721

H.R. 9721: Fiscal Sponsorship Transparency Act of 2026

Reported by Committee Lloyd Smucker (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Fiscal Sponsorship Transparency Act of 2026 aims to improve transparency and accountability for organizations that operate under fiscal sponsorship. This legislation likely requires fiscal sponsors to disclose financial information and operational practices to ensure that funds are being used appropriately and that the sponsored organizations are adhering to legal and ethical standards.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Fiscal Sponsorship Transparency Act of 2026 have praised it for promoting accountability in the nonprofit sector. They argue that increased transparency will help build public trust in fiscal sponsors and the organizations they support, ultimately leading to more effective charitable giving and improved oversight of nonprofit activities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the Fiscal Sponsorship Transparency Act of 2026 have expressed concerns that the bill may impose excessive regulatory burdens on fiscal sponsors and the organizations they support. Some argue that the additional reporting requirements could stifle innovation and limit the ability of smaller nonprofits to operate effectively, potentially hindering their ability to serve their communities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9721: Fiscal Sponsorship Transparency Act of 2026, sponsored by Lloyd Smucker, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the transparency of fiscal sponsorship, which suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. While there is significant lobbying activity in related policy areas, the amounts contributed by these entities do not directly correlate with the bill's objectives. For instance, the American College of Emergency Physicians contributed $498,299, but their interests do not align with the fiscal sponsorship transparency focus of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS $498,299
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND $150,000
COLLIER COLLECTIVE, LLC MCCOLL STRATEGIES LLC $40,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
PANO AI PANO AI $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
PSEG SERVICES CORPORATION TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
COUNTY OF NAPA PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
LAKE COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NEVADA COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
HUMBOLDT COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATORS PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
NATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
CLARK COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Lloyd Smucker, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us