H.R. 9711

H.R. 9711: To amend title 49, United States Code, to prescribe safety standards for autocycles and related equipment, and for other purposes.

Introduced John Moolenaar (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9711 aims to update U.S. transportation law by establishing safety standards specifically for autocycles, which are three-wheeled vehicles designed to be driven like cars. The bill likely addresses safety equipment and regulations to ensure these vehicles meet certain safety criteria for operation on public roads.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9711 have praised the bill for enhancing road safety and providing clearer regulations for the growing market of autocycles. The legislation is seen as a proactive step to ensure that these vehicles are safe for consumers and help prevent accidents.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9711 argue that the bill may impose unnecessary regulations on the autocycle industry, potentially stifling innovation and increasing costs for manufacturers. Some believe that existing regulations are sufficient and that this bill could create bureaucratic hurdles without significantly improving safety.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9711, which focuses on safety standards for autocycles and related equipment, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor, John Moolenaar's, top donor industries. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the specific regulations concerning autocycles, suggesting a low likelihood of conflicts of interest. Additionally, while there is significant lobbying activity in related areas, such as environmental defense and child safety, these do not directly correlate with the automotive safety standards being proposed. The total lobbying amounts do not indicate a concentrated influence from any one entity that would suggest a conflict with the bill's intent.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $410,042
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $377,725
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. $158,589
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION $150,000
SBIR CONSORTIUM JOHN WILLIAMS $30,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS $30,000
SEEING MACHINES GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC $30,000
MIDDLE EAST FORUM MIDDLE EAST FORUM $20,000
SHEA'S O'CONNELL PRESERVATION GUILD LTD. D/B/A SHEA'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTER MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
END SEPSIS CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
TECHNEST SOLUTIONS S.L.A. DBA FORTRIS ON BEHALF OF NEXUSONE CONSULTING CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
HAITELMEX FOUNDATION, INC HAITELMEX FOUNDATION, INC undisclosed
SBCC EQUIPMENT DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding John Moolenaar, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us