H.R. 9708

H.R. 9708: To provide transparency in short-term rental listings, and for other purposes.

Introduced Diana Harshbarger (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9708 aims to increase transparency in short-term rental listings, likely by requiring platforms to disclose more information about the properties listed, such as ownership details, compliance with local regulations, and possibly the number of nights rented. The bill may also address issues related to safety and consumer protection in the short-term rental market.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9708 have praised the bill for promoting accountability and safety in the short-term rental industry. They argue that increased transparency will help consumers make informed decisions and ensure that property owners comply with local laws, ultimately leading to better neighborhood relations and community trust.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9708 have expressed concerns that the bill could impose excessive regulations on short-term rental owners and platforms, potentially stifling the growth of the sharing economy. Some opponents argue that increased transparency requirements may lead to privacy issues for property owners and could deter individuals from renting out their properties.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of H.R. 9708 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Diana Harshbarger, and her top donor industries. The bill aims to provide transparency in short-term rental listings, a topic that does not appear to directly benefit any of Harshbarger's major donors. While there is significant lobbying activity from various organizations, such as the American Dental Association with $1,100,000 and Cellebrite Inc. with $70,000, these contributions do not correlate with the short-term rental industry. The absence of direct financial interests from her donors regarding this specific legislative subject suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not seem to influence this bill directly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION $1,100,000
CELLEBRITE INC. CELLEBRITE INC. $70,000
ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE $55,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE $25,000
AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE ASSOCIATION EDMUND GRABER $20,000
MATERIALS RESEARCH SOCIETY HILLSTAFFER, LLC $15,000
NAFA FLEET MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HILLSTAFFER, LLC $15,000
BETTENDORF IA EDMUND GRABER $10,000
NATIONAL UTILITY CONTRACTORS ASSN EDMUND GRABER $10,000
ILLINOIS PUBLIC TRANSIT ASSN EDMUND GRABER $10,000
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION undisclosed
FMC CORPORATION RED FLAG CONSULTING USA(FORMALLY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-GOVERNMENT COUNSELLORS, INC) undisclosed
ASSOCIATION FOR DIPLOMATIC STUDIES AND TRAINING HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed
THE ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION ASSOCIATION, INC HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Diana Harshbarger, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us