H.R. 9639

H.R. 9639: To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to restore the impaired credit of victims of predatory activities and unfair consumer reporting practices, to expand access to tools to protect vulnerable consumers from identity theft, fraud, or a relate

Introduced Rashida Tlaib (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9639 aims to amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to help victims of predatory lending and unfair consumer reporting practices restore their credit. Additionally, it seeks to provide more resources and tools to protect vulnerable consumers from identity theft and fraud.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9639 have praised the bill for its focus on consumer protection, particularly for those who have been victims of predatory practices. Advocates argue that restoring impaired credit for these individuals is crucial for their financial recovery and stability, and that the bill will empower consumers with better tools to safeguard against identity theft.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9639 have raised concerns about the potential for increased regulatory burdens on credit reporting agencies and financial institutions. Some argue that the bill may lead to unintended consequences, such as higher costs for consumers or reduced access to credit for those deemed higher risk due to their previous financial hardships.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9639, which aims to amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to assist victims of predatory activities and improve consumer protections, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Rashida Tlaib's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes contributions from various organizations, such as the American Concrete Institute ($80,000) and Anne Pramaggiore ($60,000), but these do not directly relate to consumer credit or protection issues. The absence of significant financial ties to industries that would benefit from the bill suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should note that while lobbying exists, it does not appear to influence the bill's intent or the sponsor's motivations significantly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $80,000
ANNE PRAMAGGIORE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $60,000
SIGHTLINE INTELLIGENCE C2 STRATEGIES $50,000
ACTUS ADVANCED SYSTEMS C2 STRATEGIES $40,000
WASHOE COUNTY PORTER GROUP, LLC $30,000
VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS, INC. C2 STRATEGIES $30,000
EO SOLUTIONS LLC PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
ULINE BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES $20,000
RTC SOUTHERN NEVADA PORTER GROUP, LLC $10,000
WISH BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN STATE CRANBERRY GROWERS ASSOCIATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WD SCHORSCH LLC BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Rashida Tlaib, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us