H.R. 9593

H.R. 9593: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, and for other purposes.

Introduced Debbie Dingell (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9593 aims to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban the introduction or delivery of food packaging that contains intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into interstate commerce. This legislation is intended to reduce public exposure to harmful chemicals commonly found in certain food packaging materials.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9593 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to public health and safety, highlighting the dangers posed by PFAS in food packaging. Environmental and health advocacy groups have lauded the legislation as a significant step towards reducing chemical exposure and promoting safer food systems.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9593 have raised concerns about the potential economic impacts on the food packaging industry. Some industry representatives argue that the ban could lead to increased costs and supply chain disruptions, potentially affecting food prices and availability. Additionally, there are worries about the feasibility of finding alternative materials that meet safety and performance standards.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The bill H.R. 9593 aims to prohibit food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, a significant public health issue. The sponsor, Debbie Dingell, has received substantial donations from the health professionals sector, totaling $240 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between her top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, indicating that her financial backers do not have a vested interest in PFAS regulations. The retired sector, contributing an additional $75 million, also does not present any direct conflict with the bill's objectives. Given this lack of overlap, the risk of conflict of interest appears minimal, suggesting that the motivations behind the bill are more aligned with public health rather than donor influence.

Industry Overlap — Follow the Money

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Industry Match Type Related Subject Donations
Health Professionals (H01) Sector Health $240,000,000
Total from overlapping industries $240,000,000
Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SOUTHERN MILLS, INC. D/B/A TENCATE PROTECTIVE FABRICS (FKA TENCATE) SOUTHERN MILLS, INC. D/B/A TENCATE PROTECTIVE FABRICS (FKA TENCATE) $130,000
IAC SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $60,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
BALANCE OF NATURE AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $45,000
GLOBAL ARM PLURUS STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
SOCIETY OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE CAVAROCCHI RUSCIO DENNIS ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. $30,000
SHEARWATER HEALTH AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $30,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE PLURUS STRATEGIES, LLC $20,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $15,000
CACHE VALLEY TRANSIT DISTRICT AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $15,000
THE BENNETT GROUP DC ON BEHALF OF ENEXOR BIOENERGY AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $10,000
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE (API) KELLER AND HECKMAN, LLP undisclosed
LASSEN PEAK, INC. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
'INTERNET OF EVERYTHING CORP. (FKA QUISNET). AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP undisclosed
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, FORMERLY REPORTED AS KIA CORPORATION SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Debbie Dingell, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us