H.R. 9592

H.R. 9592: To authorize the Secretary of State to take certain actions to counter and reduce threats to the space security of the United States, to require the Secretary of State to provide certain consultations to Congress on the space security of the U

Introduced Sheri Biggs (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9592 is a bill that aims to empower the Secretary of State to take specific actions to address and mitigate threats to the United States' space security. Additionally, the bill requires the Secretary of State to provide Congress with certain consultations regarding the state of U.S. space security.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9592 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to safeguarding U.S. interests in space. They argue that it emphasizes the importance of space security in a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape and demonstrates a commitment to maintaining U.S. leadership in space exploration and defense.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9592 have expressed concerns that the bill may lead to increased militarization of space and could escalate tensions with other nations. Some commentators argue that it lacks specific details on implementation and could divert resources away from more pressing terrestrial security issues.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Science, Technology, Communications

The analysis of H.R. 9592, which focuses on space security, shows no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Sheri Biggs' top donors and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in space security, indicating a low potential for conflicts of interest. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes various organizations, but they primarily represent sectors such as concrete and local government entities, which are not directly related to space security. Thus, the financial influence on the bill is minimal in terms of direct conflicts. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the lack of overlapping interests suggests that the motivations behind the bill are not financially compromised by donor influence.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $80,000
ANNE PRAMAGGIORE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $60,000
SIGHTLINE INTELLIGENCE C2 STRATEGIES $50,000
ACTUS ADVANCED SYSTEMS C2 STRATEGIES $40,000
WASHOE COUNTY PORTER GROUP, LLC $30,000
VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS, INC. C2 STRATEGIES $30,000
EO SOLUTIONS LLC PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
ULINE BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES $20,000
RTC SOUTHERN NEVADA PORTER GROUP, LLC $10,000
WISH BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN STATE CRANBERRY GROWERS ASSOCIATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WD SCHORSCH LLC BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sheri Biggs, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us