H.R. 9554

H.R. 9554: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against tax for qualified accessible housing expenses, and for other purposes.

Introduced George Latimer (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9554 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to introduce a tax credit for individuals or entities that incur qualified expenses related to making housing more accessible. This could include modifications for people with disabilities, aiming to promote inclusivity in housing options.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9554 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance the quality of life for individuals with disabilities by making housing more accessible. Advocates argue that the tax credit could incentivize property owners to invest in necessary modifications, ultimately fostering a more inclusive society.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9554 have raised concerns about the potential financial implications of the tax credit on federal revenue. Some argue that while the intention is commendable, the bill may lead to unintended consequences, such as creating disparities in housing accessibility based on financial resources.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The bill H.R. 9554 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide tax credits for qualified accessible housing expenses. The sponsor, George Latimer, has significant financial backing from the health professionals sector, totaling $120 million, and from retired individuals, amounting to $37.5 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the industries of Latimer's top donors. This suggests that the financial interests of his major donors are not directly aligned with the provisions of the bill. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes various organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial stake in accessible housing expenses, further indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while the sponsor has substantial backing from health professionals, it does not translate into a conflict regarding this specific legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $810,990
AMERICAN LEGION THE AMERICAN LEGION $190,000
ARES MANAGEMENT LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
CALISTA CORPORATION CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION $50,000
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INC BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC. $10,000
EXODIGO, LLC (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $10,000
TERAMIND, INC. (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE undisclosed
INTELSAT GENERAL CORPORATION VELOS undisclosed
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC undisclosed
NACHA, THE ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS ASSOCIATION NACHA, THE ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding George Latimer, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us