H.R. 9529

H.R. 9529: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a tax on net capital gain accrued while serving as President of the United States.

Introduced Andrea Salinas (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9529 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code to impose a tax on the net capital gains that a person accrues while serving as President of the United States. This means that any profits made from investments or assets during a President's time in office would be subject to taxation.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9529 argue that the bill promotes fairness in the tax system by ensuring that even the highest office in the country is not exempt from capital gains taxes. They believe it could help reduce income inequality and ensure that wealthy individuals contribute their fair share to public finances.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9529 contend that the bill could discourage individuals from running for the presidency, as it introduces a financial burden during their term. Some argue that it may be seen as politically motivated and could set a precedent for targeting specific groups for taxation based on their position in government.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9529, which proposes a tax on net capital gains accrued while serving as President, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Andrea Salinas, and her top donor industries. This lack of overlap suggests that the bill's subject matter is not influenced by the financial interests of her primary supporters. Furthermore, while there is significant lobbying activity in related policy areas, the contributions from these entities do not directly correlate with the provisions of the bill. For instance, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee contributed $810,990, but their interests do not appear to intersect with the taxation of capital gains. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest remains low as the financial backers do not stand to gain or lose directly from this legislative proposal.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $810,990
AMERICAN LEGION THE AMERICAN LEGION $190,000
ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
CALISTA CORPORATION CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
POLARIS CONSULTING ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
TELESAT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS VELOS $40,000
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
PUGET SOUND ENERGY ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $30,000
KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INC BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC. $10,000
TERAMIND, INC. (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE undisclosed
INTELSAT GENERAL CORPORATION VELOS undisclosed
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andrea Salinas, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $160,000,000
Individuals: $160,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $50,000,000
Individuals: $50,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us