H.R. 9369

H.R. 9369: To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize employees or authorized agents to edit or annotate electronic logging device records as long as such employee or agent is physically located in North America and the edit or annotation is sub

Introduced W. Steube (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9369 is a bill that proposes to amend the United States Code, specifically title 49, to allow employees or authorized agents to make edits or annotations to electronic logging device (ELD) records. This permission is contingent on the employee or agent being physically located in North America and ensuring that the edits or annotations are subject to certain conditions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9369 argue that the bill enhances operational flexibility for companies using electronic logging devices. They believe it will streamline record-keeping processes and improve compliance with federal regulations, ultimately benefiting the trucking industry by allowing timely corrections to ELD records.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9369 express concerns that allowing edits or annotations to electronic logging device records could lead to potential abuse and manipulation of data. They worry that this may undermine the integrity of logging systems designed to ensure safety and compliance in the transportation sector, potentially jeopardizing road safety.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9369, sponsored by W. Steube, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill focuses on amending regulations around electronic logging devices, which is primarily relevant to the transportation and logistics sectors. While there is significant lobbying activity in this area, the contributions from these lobbying entities do not directly correlate with the sponsor's donor base, indicating a low risk of conflicts of interest. The total lobbying contributions in this policy area amount to $300,000, but these funds do not appear to influence the sponsor's legislative agenda based on the current data.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERISIGN, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $90,000
VIASAT, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $80,000
NEXT GLOBAL CAPITAL, INC. OBO WHITEFOX DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $60,000
AI POLICY NETWORK INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $45,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR SECURE AI ACTION SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
STREET SMARTS VR SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
NATILUS SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC. OBO PRIETO BATTERY, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
SACHEM, INC. RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $30,000
PLUG POWER RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $20,000
SLEVIN ADVISORY LLC O/B/O THE IFP ACTION RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $10,000
KYLE HOUSE GROUP, LLC SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $10,000
BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH (FORMERLY MERCY HEALTH) BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH (FORMERLY MERCY HEALTH) undisclosed
SWIFT CURRENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. TRIAD STRATEGIES, LLC. undisclosed
PRECISION CUSTOM COMPONENTS, LLC TRIAD STRATEGIES, LLC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us