H.R. 9289

H.R. 9289: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the tax credit for contributions of individuals to scholarship granting organizations, and for other purposes.

Introduced Gwen Moore (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9289 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code by eliminating the tax credit that individuals can receive for contributions made to scholarship granting organizations. This change would affect the financial incentives for individuals who donate to organizations that provide scholarships for students.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9289 argue that repealing the tax credit could lead to a more equitable education funding system, ensuring that public resources are allocated more effectively rather than relying on private donations. They believe this could enhance transparency in educational funding.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9289 contend that repealing the tax credit would discourage charitable contributions to scholarship granting organizations, potentially reducing the financial assistance available to students seeking educational opportunities. This move is seen as a setback for school choice advocates and could disproportionately impact low-income families who benefit from scholarship programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9289, which seeks to repeal the tax credit for contributions to scholarship granting organizations, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Gwen Moore's top donor industries. While there is lobbying activity from various organizations, the contributions do not appear to directly influence the bill's intent or provisions. The largest contributions from organizations like the American Subcontractor Association ($30,000) and the American Council of Independent Laboratories ($20,000) do not correlate with the educational funding sector that the bill addresses. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low, as there is no clear financial incentive for the sponsor to act against the interests of her constituents regarding this bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
CHRISTIAN CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Gwen Moore, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us